The actor resembles a video game animation when he flies from a third person view in the sky, enhancing humor. People argue that the movie lacks originality, but its effects are exceptional. Bateman acts like the actor found in Wilson in My Super Ex-Girlfriend, whose performance is excellent (Smith and Bateman par 4). Evidently, even his emotions and expressions are different from the ones he had worked in his past characters. He is different from most of his roles he plays in the movie and when one watches he or she feels like they are meeting him, but with a varying personality. This implies that it is a good movie Moreover, John is good. Until the second half of the film, there is a significant twist that delivers a new plot to the movie. What they forget is that Hancock ensures that the story he narrates gets his job done as he expects. Those who dislike him argue that the movie gets weaker every time and the action sequence becomes cheesier by the minutes. If the whole movie is about that, then, it would be excellent, and everybody would like to watch it.
This is shown where Bateman tries to work with him and improve his image. He demonstrates all crazy things that he must have thought of before acting and displays all of them. Hancock might have thought carefully before composing his movie. The idea of a mortal when there are in each other’s presence is annoying to some people, but is meant to act as a climax in the movie. As they continue acting the scene changes and probably this could be one of the reasons people hate it. Hancock demonstrates the virtues of love and friendship when he shows his relationship with Mary, although, there is no chemistry between them.
I do not think that these should form the basis of his hatred. Additionally, some people could hate him because he is regarded as a superpower, something that makes him a mythology. For example, the prevalent use of metaphors that make most people dislike him can change their attitude if their meanings are examined (Smith and Bateman par 3). If some of the ideas that make people hate Hancock are explored keenly, people would turn to love the movie. However, this should be viewed as a way of transiting from one mood to another, but not a weakness in the movie. In this part, many people argue that the humorous movie part is outweighed by the dull Bateman’s feeling sad. It is quite funny that Smith had to go to jail to learn issues concerning humility, and when he goes there, he does not differentiate between the police officers and other people. I like this guy acts and wonder why people dislike the movie. Although the presence of the white man as well as his attempt to civilize Hancock looks crazy, it produces some humor as one watches the movie. In fact, the character adds humor to the movie by trying to rehabilitate Hancock’s image and motivates him to play nice (Smith and Bateman par 2). For example, Jason Bateman shines in the movie, despite the fact that he fails to convince the firms to sign on to his unreliable, weak charity project. The damages he causes when fighting criminals should not be viewed from the negative perspective.Īnother reason that Hancock should be called a good movie is the use of actors that shine throughout the movie.
Although many hate him because of his destructive behavior during the movie, his actions show that he is a protector of nature and focuses on helping the people in need. Why is the article calling Hancock a superhero? In fact, he is held to be a god in the universe. The style he uses shows how bendable the contemporary mythology of superheroes is. The reason Smith does not use supervillains is because he wants to tell a simple, and comprehensible narration within the shortest time possible. In fact, the filmmaker utilizes his time fighting small-time felons who does not threaten him. It is vital to state that Hancock is the only contemporary superhero who does not use supervillains and oversized threats in the movie (Smith and Bateman par 2).
0 kommentar(er)
